1 18 2018 2 35 20 pm.
Home office uk visas immigration v ms kuranchie. Read the full decision ms p kuranchie v home office uk visas and immigration 2362392 2013 full read the full decision ms p kuranchie v home office uk visas and immigration 2362392 2013 reasons. Microsoft word kuranchie v home office 2362392x13 r 14 12 17 docx. The home office approved her request in may 2013 and allowed her to work compressed hours i e. The employment tribunal found the home office had a provision or practice of giving ms kuranchie the same volume of work as her colleagues.
The home office uk visas and immigration v kuranchie disability discrimination. The parties are as we shall describe them ms kuranchie the claimant and the home office uk visas immigration the respondent. In home office uk visas immigration v ms kuranchie ms kuranchie had an excellent educational background and had progressed through the home office s ranks to the position of assistant director the parties agreed that she had dyspraxia and dyslexia. Microsoft word kuranchie v home office 2362392x13 docx author.
In 2013 she expressed concern that a lack of adjustments to accommodate her disability meant she was having to work long hours to. Ukeat 0202 16 ba employment appeal tribunal fleetbank house 2 6 salisbury square london ec4y 8ae at the tribunal on 14 december 2016 judgment handed down on 19 january 2017 before his honour judge peter clark mr m sibbald ms p tatlow the home office. The home office uk visas immigration v ms p kuranchie appeal no. She worked longer days for four days a week.
Ms kuranchie suffered from dyspraxia and dyslexia and found that due to her disabilities it took longer for her to complete her work. Uk visas and immigration is responsible for making millions of decisions every year about who has the right to visit or stay in the country with a firm emphasis on national security and a culture. However the home office did not reduce her workload. 2017 ukeat 0202 16 1901.
By a reserved judgment and reasons dated 13 april 2016 an employment tribunal chaired by employment judge baron dismissed the claimant s complaints of race and sex discrimination and upheld one complaint of.